Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:27

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
BOJ braces for higher interest rates with provisions boost - Nikkei Asia
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Fallout meets BioShock in fascinating new adventure game - GAMINGbible
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Algorithm to analyze smartphone app data can predict MS symptoms - Multiple Sclerosis News Today
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
New Research Reveals the Brain Learns Differently Than We Thought - SciTechDaily
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
How the Universe and Its Mirrored Version Are Different - WIRED
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Hegseth warns China poses 'imminent' threat to Taiwan and urges Asia to boost defence - BBC